ISSN 0021-3454 (print version)
ISSN 2500-0381 (online version)
Menu

2
Issue
vol 67 / February, 2024
Article

DOI 10.17586/0021-3454-2018-61-7-584-589

UDC 629.783

BASIC CONCEPTS OF A METHOD FOR COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF TECHNICAL LEVEL OF UNIFIED SPACE PLATFORMS

Y. G. Pichurin
А. A. Maksimov Space Systems Research Institute − Branch of Khrunichev State Research and Production Space Center JSC; Deputy Director of Complex


A. V. Radkov
А. A. Maksimov Space Systems Research Institute − Branch of Khrunichev State Research and Production Space Center JSC; Senior Scientist, Director of Complex


Read the full article 

Abstract. Unified space platforms (USP) are increasingly being used In space projects implementation. The concept of the unification principle consists in the possibility of constructing space platforms with tactical and technical characteristics corresponding to the intended purpose of the spacecraft project from a set of reliable and tested blocks and devices, including those having flying qualifications. Application of unified space platforms is mainly aimed at providing a useful load of resources by mass, energy, operating conditions, required accuracy of orientation and stabilization, maneuvering capabilities in orbit, command and telemetry information. Basic concepts of comparative evaluation of the technical level of the universal space platforms are considered. The methods in question are reducing the multicriteria problem to a onecriterion one, by introducing a complex performance indicator that depends on partial parameters, thus performing the so-called convolution of criteria.
Keywords: unified space platforms, technical level, methodology, criteria, comparative evaluation, main characteristics

References:
  1. Zaichko V.A. Geomatics, 2015, no. 2, рр. 12–21. (in Russ.)
  2. Raykunov G.G., Lyubchenko F.N., Karelin A.V. Cosmonautics and Rocket Engineering, 2012, no. 3(68), рр. 5–20. (in Russ.)
  3. Il’ichev A.V. Effektivnost’ proyektiruyemoy tekhniki. Osnovy analiza (Efficiency of the Designed Equipment. Analysis Bases), Moscow, 1991, 336 р. (in Russ.)
  4. Volotsuyev V.V., Tkachenko I.S., Safronov S.L. Vestnik of the Samara State Aerospace University, 2012, no. 2 (33), рр. 35–46. (in Russ.)
  5. Obshchiye metodicheskiye rekomendatsii, po otsenke tekhnicheskogo urovnya promyshlennoy produktsii. Standarty i kachestvo (General Guidelines for the Assessment of the Technical Level of Industrial Products. Standards and Quality), 1990, no. 9, рр. 33–37. (in Russ.)
  6. Metodika otsenki urovnya konkurentosposobnosti promyshlennoy produktsii (Methods of Assessing the Level of Competitiveness of Industrial Products), Moscow, 1984, 118 р. (in Russ.)
  7. Metodicheskiye ukazaniya. Ustanovleniye bazovykh obraztsov dlya otsenki tekhnicheskogo urovnya i kachestva promyshlennoy produktsii (RD 50-451-84) (Methodical Instructions. Establishment of Basic Samples for Evaluation of Technical Level and Quality of Industrial Products (RD 50-451-84)), Moscow, 1984, 23 р. (in Russ.)
  8. Pichurin Yu.G., Rad’kov A.V. et al. Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy otchet o nauchno-issledovatel’skoy rabote "Otsenka tekhnicheskogo urovnya sushchestvuyushchikh kosmicheskikh platform, formirovaniye proyektnogo oblika bazovykh kosmicheskikh platform novogo pokoleniya s uchеtom realizatsii perspektivnykh tekhnicheskikh resheniy i tekhnologiy". Shifr "Platforma – GKNPTS (Scientific and Technical Report on the Research Work "Assessment of the Technical Level of Existing Space Platforms, the Formation of the Design of the Basic Space Platforms of the New Generation, Taking into Account the Implementation of Advanced Technical Solutions and Technologies), Moscow, 2013, 187 р. (in Russ.)
  9. Fortescue P., Swinerd G., and Stark J. Spacecraft Systems Engineering, J. Wiley & Sons, 2011.