Optimization of the Structure of the Optical System of Faceted Optoelectronic Devices

Recommendations for optimizing the angular field structure of faceted optoelectronic systems are presented. It is shown that the faceted structure of the angular field makes it possible to change the angular direction of the facets, to sample objects in space with overlapping adjacent angular fields of the facets, thereby making it possible to increase the spatial resolution of the optoelectronic system, increase the entrance pupil of the optical system, realize a variable (spatially variable) angular field resolution of the system, and reduce the amount of information transmitted. and, accordingly, increase the image transfer rate. Mathematical expressions defining the energy relations for image characteristics in faceted optical systems and the information capacity of the image are obtained. Examples of faceted optoelectronic systems are given.

1. Mazokhin-Porshni͡akov G.A. Insect vision, NY, Plenum Press, 1969, 306 p.

2. Solomatin V.A. Photonics, 2019, no. 1(13), pp. 66–73. (in Russ.)

3. Solomatin V.A. Photonics, 2010, no. 1(4), pp. 20–25. (in Russ.)

4. Certificate of authorship USSR 4689468/22, Ustroystvo dlya opredeleniya azimuta svetoizluchayushchikh ob”yektov (A Device for Determining the Azimuth of Light-Emitting Objects), V.A. Solomatin et al., 05.05.89. (in Russ.)

5. Visconti C., Landini S., Barani G. et al. Proc. SPIE, 1998, vol. 2466, pp. 842–846.

6. Marks D.L., Tremblay E.J., Ford J.E. and Brady D.J. Appl. Opt., 2011, no. 50(30), pp. 5824–5833.

7. Land M.F. and Nilsson D.-E. Animal Eyes, Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 2012, DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199581139.001.0001.

8. Kirschfeld K. Neural Principles in Vision, Berlin, Springer, 1976, рр. 354–370, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-66432-8_19.

9. Tsytsulin A.K., Adamov D.Yu., Mantsvetov A.A., Zubakin I.A. Tverdotel’nyye telekamery: nakopleniye kachestva informatsii (Solid-state Television Cameras: Accumulation of Information Quality), St. Petersburg, 2014, 271 р. (in Russ.)

10. Yang Cheng, Jie Cao, Fanghua Zhang, Qun Hao, Sci. Rep., 2018, no. 1(8), pp. 17164, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018- 35098-9.

11. Drac M., Berger A., Ettinger B., Gebeshuber I.C. Frontiers in Materials, 2020, vol. 7, рр. 199, DOI: 10.3389/fmats.2020.00199.

12. Fedyanina R.S., Sokolinsky L.B. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Computational Mathematics and Informatics, 2020, no. 4(9), pp. 48–66. (in Russ.)

13. Pérez L., Rodríguez Í., Rodríguez N. et al. Sensors, 2016, no. 3(16), pp. 335, DOI: 10.3390/s16030335.

14. Llamazares Á., Molinos E.J., Ocaña M. Robotica, 2020, no. 5(38), pp. 761–774, DOI: 10.1017/S0263574719001024.