Method for Determining the Modulation Coefficient of the Magnetometric System of a Quantum Rotation Sensor
https://doi.org/10.17586/0021-3454-2026-69-3-253-261
Abstract
The problem of choosing the modulation coefficient for the magnetometric system of a quantum rotation sensor in order to increase the signal-to-noise ratio during measurements is considered. Experimental results are presented that demonstrate the possibility of evaluating the quality of resonance in a quantum rotation sensor cell in two different ways: the classical laboratory method based on varying the modulation coefficient and analyzing the amplitude of the output signal, and the proposed method based on estimating the parameters of the magnetometric signal. There is also a comparison of the time spent on the implementation of each of the methods. Based on these studies, an approach has been developed to choose the value of the modulation coefficient, taking into account the current resonance quality in the system.
About the Authors
A. N. ShevchenkoRussian Federation
Alexander N. Shevchenko —Laboratory; Deputy Head of the Laboratory
St. Petersburg
V. V. Chalkov
Russian Federation
Viktor V. Chalkov — Concern CSRI Elektropribor, Laboratory; Engineer
St. Petersburg
References
1. Peshekhonov V.G. Gyroscopy and Navigation, 2020, no. 2(11), pp. 188–192.
2. Vershovskii A.K., Litmanovich Yu.A., Pazgalev A.S., Peshekhonov V.G. Giroskopiya i Navigatsiya, 2018, no. 1(26), pp. 55–80. (in Russ.)
3. Bloch F. Physical Review, 1946, vol. 70, рр. 460–473, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.70.460.
4. Popov E.N., Barantsev K.A., and Litvinov A.N. Kvantovaya Elektronika, 2019, no. 2(49), pp. 169–177, DOI:10.1070/ QEL16720.
5. Ding M. Navigatsiya i upravleniye dvizheniyem (Navigation and Motion Control), Proc. of the XX Conf. of Young Scientists with Intern. Participation, St. Petersburg, 2018, рр. 21–22. (in Russ.)
6. Walker T.G., Larsen M.S. Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 2016, vol. 65, рр. 373–401, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1604.03982.
7. Cohen-Tannoudji C., Dupont-Roc J., Haroche S., Laloe F. Revue de Physique Appliquée, 1970, vol. 5, рр. 95–101, DOI: 10.1051/rphysap:019700050109500.
8. Eklund E. Microgyroscope Based on Spin-Polarized Nuclei, PhD thesis, University of California, Irvine, 2008, 228 p.
9. Chalkov V.V., Shevchenko A.N. Navigatsiya i upravleniye dvizheniyem (Navigation and Motion Control), Proc. of the XX Conf. of Young Scientists with Intern. Participation, St. Petersburg, 2021, рр. 193–195. (in Russ.)
10. Sharshavin P.V. Reshetnev Readings, 2011, no. 15, pp. 197–198, https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/integratsiya-pretsizionnogo-magnitometra-s-bortovoy-apparaturoy-bespilotnogo-letatelnogo-apparata. (in Russ.)
11. Feng Tang, Ai-xian Li, Ke Zhang, Yanhua Wang and Nan Zhao, J. of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 2019, no. 20(52), pp. 205001, DOI: 10.1088/1361-6455/ab2a99.
12. Ke Zhang, Zhihuang Luo, Feng Tang1, Nan Zhao and Yanhua Wang, Japanese J. of Applied Physics, 2020, no. 3(59), pp. 030907, DOI: 10.35848/1347-4065/ab6caf.
13. Wenhao Luo, Hong Zhang, Yan Liu, Xiaogang Wei, Xiaonan Zhang, Yanhua Wang, Renfu Yang, J. Appl. Phys., 2022, no. 14(132), pp. 144401, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0096583.
14. Zhiguo Wanga, Baolun Yuana, Hongchang Zhaoa, Miao Chenc, Xiang Zhan, Hui Luo, J. of Magnetic Resonance, 2021, vol. 326, рр. 106959, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2021.106959.
15. Xiujie Fang, Kai Wei, Yueyang Zhai, Tian Zhao, Xu Chen, Mingti Zhou, Ying Liu, Danyue Ma, and Zhisong Xiao, Optics Express, 2022, no. 3(30), pp. 3926–3940, DOI: 10.1364/OE.447041.
16. Chalkov V.V., Shevchenko A.N. Almanac of Scientific Works of Young Scientists of ITMO University, 2019, рр. 157–160. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Shevchenko A.N., Chalkov V.V. Method for Determining the Modulation Coefficient of the Magnetometric System of a Quantum Rotation Sensor. Journal of Instrument Engineering. 2026;69(3):253-261. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17586/0021-3454-2026-69-3-253-261
JATS XML














