ISSN 0021-3454 (print version)
ISSN 2500-0381 (online version)
Menu

8
Issue
vol 60 / AUGUST, 2017
Article

DOI 10.17586/0021-3454-2016-59-3-231-236

UDC 381.53.08.519

ASSESSMENT METHODS FOR WORKPIECE SURFACE MICROGEOMETRY

V. M. Medunetskiy
Saint Petersburg National University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, Saint Petersburg, Russia; Professor


S. D. Vasilkov
Saint Petersburg National research University of Information Technology, Mechanics and Optics; Associate professor


Read the full article 

Abstract. An analysis of standard methods of parts surface microgeometry assessment is carried out. Consideration is given to a new method defined as a nonparametric approach (prof. V. A. Valetov method) based on the use of graphic images of various functions as standards for estimation and control of surface microgeometry. Effectiveness of this approach is confirmed by presented results of experimental studies performed with the use of nonparametric estimation criteria.
Keywords: surface microgeometry, nonparametric estimation criteria, function graph image, ordinates distribution function

References:

 

  1. Andreev Yu.S., Medunetskiy V.V. Izv. vuzov. Priborostroenie, 2012, no. 9(55), pp. 30–34. (in Russ.)
  2. Kragel'skiy I.V., Dobychin M.N., Kombalov V.S. Osnovy raschetov na trenie i iznos (Fundamentals of Calculations on Friction and Deterioration), Moscow, 1977, 344 p. (in Russ.)
  3. Davydov V.M., Zayev V.V., Panochevnyi P.N., Kozachenko I.A., Prokhorets O.V. Electronic scientific journal "Scientists notes PNU", http://pnu.edu.ru/media/ejournal/articles-2013/TGU_4_199.pdf.
  4. Torims T., Vilcans J., Zarins M., Strazdina I., Ratkus A. Annals of DAAAM for 2010 & Proc. of the 21st Intern. DAAAM Symp., 2010, no. 1(21), pp.835–836.
  5. Jiang X., Scott P.J., Whitehouse D.J., Blunt L. Proc. R. Soc. A, 2007, no. 463, pp. 2071–2099, DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2007.1873.
  6. Franco L. A., Sinatora A. Precision Engineering, 2015, no. 40, pp. 106–111.
  7. Sabeur M., Ibrahim D., Mohame E.-M., Hassan Z. Tribology International, 2013, no. 59, pp. 240–247, DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2012.01.015.
  8. Bergman M., Rosen B.-G., Eriksson L., Anderberg C. Proc. of the 14th Intern. Conf. on Metrology and Properties of Engineering Surfaces, Journal of Physics, Conf. Ser., 2014, nо. 483, DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/483/1/012013.
  9. Zawada-Tomkiewicz A. Estonian Journal of Engineering, 2011, no. 1(17), pp. 88–99, DOI: 10.3176/eng.2011.1.09.
  10. Valetov V.A., Medunetskiy V.V. Metalloobrabotka, 2012, no. 3(69), pp. 19–23. (in Russ.)
  11. Valetov V.A. Proceedings of Leningrad Shipbuilding Institute, 1976, no. 108, pp. 135–140. (in Russ.)
  12.  Valetov V.A., Filimonova E.A. Izv. vuzov. Priborostroenie, 2014, no. 8(57), pp. 52–54. (in Russ.)
  13. Melikyan S.R. Measurement Techniques, 2015, no. 12(57).
  14. Tret'yakov S.D., Yul'metova O.S. Izv. vuzov. Priborostroenie, 2010, no. 8(53), pp. 12–15. (in Russ.)
  15. Ivanov A.Y., Leonov D.B. Fundamental Sciences and Applications, Journal of the Techn. Univ. Sofia, Plovdiv branch, Bulgaria, 2012, no. 17, pp. 19–23.
  16. Valetov V.A., Medunetskiy V.V. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2012, no. 2(78), pp. 113–117. (in Russ.)