ISSN 0021-3454 (print version)
ISSN 2500-0381 (online version)
Menu

4
Issue
vol 67 / April, 2024
Article

DOI 10.17586/0021-3454-2019-62-10-907-913

UDC 004.054:519.248

SOFTWARE ASSESSMENT BY A SET OF INDICATORS

A. S. Buryy
All-Russian Research Institute of Classification, Terminology and Information on Standardization and Quality (STANDARTINFORM);


E. V. Morin
Rostest-Moscow ;


Read the full article 

Abstract. The problem of software evaluation based on results of tests performed during its certification is considered. The formulated approach is based on relationship between criteria, factors, metrics and evaluated features of software and can be used in creation of a database of test results for different types of software. At the preliminary stage, it is advisable to analyze the formed sets, providing a check of the structural properties (observability, decomposability, aggregation) of the measuring complex of the test center (laboratory). The applied estimates of utility function can be used in express analysis of soft-ware products, as well as for formation of relevant databases of test units.
Keywords: assessment of software mean, set of indicators, features scales, utility function

References:
  1. Mikhaylov Yu.B. Nauchno-metodicheskiye osnovy prakticheskikh prilozheniy kolichestvennykh otsenok kharakteristik sistem (Scientific and Methodological Foundations of Practical Applications of Quantitative Assessments of System Characteristics), Moscow, 2018. (in Russ.)
  2. Iyudu K.A. Nadezhnost', kontrol' i diagnostika vychislitel'nykh mashin i sistem (Reliability, Control and Diagnostics of Computers and Systems), Moscow, 1989. (in Russ.)
  3. Buryy A.S. Otkazoustoychivyye raspredelennyye sistemy pererabotki informatsii (Fault-Tolerant Distributed Information Processing Systems), Moscow, 2016. (in Russ.)
  4. Lomakin M.I., Mironov A.N., Shestopalova O.L Measurement Techniques, 2014, no. 1(57), pp. 8–15.
  5. Nogin V.D. Prinyatiye resheniy v mnogokriterial'noy srede: kolichestvennyy podkhod (Decision Making in a Multi-criteria Environment: a Quantitative Approach), Moscow, 2005. (in Russ.)
  6. Buravlev A.I., Brezgin V.S. Vooruzheniye i ekonomika (Armament and Economics), 2009, no. 1, pp. 26–29. (in Russ.)
  7. Fishburn P.C. Utilitu Theory for Decision Making, NY, 1970.
  8. Mesarović M., Takahara Y. General systems theory: mathematical foundations, Academic Press, 1975.
  9. Sharakshane A.S., Khaletskiy A.K., Morozov I.A. Otsenka kharakteristik slozhnykh avtomatizirovannykh sistem (Assessment of the Characteristics of Complex Automated Systems), Moscow, 1993. (in Russ.)
  10. Lipayev V.V. Sertifikatsiya programmnykh sredstv (Software Certification), Moscow, 2010. (in Russ.)