ISSN 0021-3454 (print version)
ISSN 2500-0381 (online version)
Menu

12
Issue
vol 63 / December, 2020
Article

DOI 10.17586/0021-3454-2020-63-3-264-277

UDC 629.7

Estimation of the „Production Quality Factor“ for the Model of Failure Rate of Radio Equipment of Unmanned Automatic Spacecraft

P. S. Korolev
Higher School of Economics, Department of Electronic Engineering; Lecturer; Post-Graduate Student


V. V. Zhadnov
Higher School of Economics, Department of Electronic Engineering;


Read the full article 

Abstract. A method for evaluating the "production quality factor", developed for calculating the failure rate of radio engineering devices of unmanned automatic space vehicles, is presented. A distinctive feature of the proposed method is accounting for activities regulated not only by normative-technical documentation on the creation, production and exploitation of electronic devices, but also by a system of quality management and applying a structured approach to the development of the questionnaire for subsequent expert assessment of the external and internal audit. It is anticipated that application of formulas derived to obtain a numerical value of the "production quality factor" may increase the accuracy of calculations of the reliability characteristics of radio engineering devices of unmanned automatic spacecraft at the design stage.
Keywords: dependability, reliability, production quality factor, electronic device, automatic spacecraft, artificial earth satellite

References:

 

1. https://www.ecoruspace.me/orbital_failures.html.

2. Artyukhova M.A., Zhadnov V.V., Polesskiy S.N. Components & Technologies, 2014, no. 4(153),
pp. 204–207. (in Russ.)

3. Tyulevin S.V. Nauka i innovatsii v sovremennom mire: tekhnika i tekhnologii, Odessa, 2017, рр. 7–31. (in Russ.)

4. Sevast'yanov N.N., Andreyev A.I. Osnovy upravleniya nadezhnost'yu kosmicheskikh apparatov s dlitel'nymi srokami ekspluatatsii: uchebnoye posobiye (Basics of Managing the Reliability of Spacecraft with Long Life: a Training Manual), Tomsk, 2015, 266 р. (in Russ.)

5. Sevast'yanov N.N. Cosmonautics and Rocket Engineering, 2017, no. 3(96), pp. 133–148. (in Russ.)

6. Patraev V.E., Maksimov Yu.V. Journal of Instrument Engineering, 2008, no. 8(51), pp. 5–12. (in Russ.)

7. Rudakov V.B., Burtsev A.S., Filonenko P.A., Mironichev V.A. Journal of Instrument Engineering, 2018, no. 7(61), pp. 566–575. DOI: 10.17586/0021-3454-2018-61-7-566-575. (in Russ.)

8. Goncharov V.V., Baklanov V.I., Burtsev A.S., Filonenko P.A., Erofeeva T.G., Turchin M.N. Journal of Instrument Engineering, 2018, no. 7(61), pp. 612–617. DOI: 10.17586/0021-3454-2018-61-7-612-617. (in Russ.)

9. Nadezhnost' ERI 2006: spravochnik (Reliability ERI 2006: A Guide), Moscow, 2006, 641 р. (in Russ.)

10. Korolev P.S. Mezhvuzovskaya nauchno-tekhnicheskaya konferentsiya studentov, aspirantov i molodykh spetsialistov im E.V. Armenskogo (E.V. Armensky Interuniversity Scientific and Technical Conference of Students, Graduate Students and Young Specialists), Moscow, 2019, рр. 147–148. (in Russ.)

11. Nadezhnost' ERI IP 2006: spravochnik (Reliability ERI IP 2006: a guide), Moscow, 2006, 52 р. (in Russ.)

12. RIAC-HDBK-217Plus. Handbook of 217PlusTM reliability prediction models, USA, RIAC, 2006, 170 p.

13. Belous A.I., Solodukha V.A., Shvedov S.V. Kosmicheskaya elektronika (Space Electronics), Book 2, Moscow, 2015, 696 р. (in Russ.)