ISSN 0021-3454 (print version)
ISSN 2500-0381 (online version)
Menu

4
Issue
vol 67 / April, 2024
Article

DOI 10.17586/0021-3454-2023-66-5-423-429

UDC 681.325

OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUE FOR A TIME-OF-FLIGHT OPTICAL TURBIDIMETER

N. H. Javadov
National Aerospace Agency of Azerbaijan Republic; General Manager


F. G. Agaev
Space Research Institute of Natural Resources ; Director


B. R. Jabbarli
Azerbaijan Technical University, Department of Special Technologies;

Reference for citation: Javadov N. H., Agaev F. G., Jabbarli B. R. Optimization technique for a time-of-flight optical turbidimeter. Journal of Instrument Engineering. 2023. Vol. 66, N 5. P. 423—429 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17586/0021-3454-2023-66-5-423-429.

Abstract. The issues of optimizing a fiber-optic time-of-flight optical turbidimeter are discussed and the conditions for its optimal operation with sensitivity being the optimization criterion, are determined for both conventional and distributed implementations. An optimization technique is proposed: for the usual case, expressions are obtained for the optimal relationship between the measurement time on the receiving fiber of the light signal emitted by the transmitting fiber, counted from the pulse start moment, and the distance between the transmitting and receiving fibers; for the distributed version of the implementation of the turbidimeter, the conditions for the extreme operation mode are determined. The technique can be applied in advanced water quality control systems.
Keywords: turbidimeter, optical fiber, measurements, optimization, time-of-flight principle

References:
  1. McCarthy D.T., Zhang K., Westerlund C., Viklander M., Bertrand-Krjewski J.L., Fletcher T.D., Deletic A. Water Res., 2018, no. 129, pp. 297–304.
  2. Rai A.K., Kumar A. Measurement, 2015, no. 76, pp. 209–227.
  3. Voichick N., Topping D.J., Griffiths R.E. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, October 2017, DOI:10.5194/hess-2017-528.
  4. Rymszewicz A., OSullivan J., Bruen M., Turner J., Lawler D., Cornoy E., Kelly-Quinn M. J. Environ. Manag., 2017, no. 199, pp. 99–108.
  5. Shenoy M.R., Pal B.P., Gupta B.D. IEEE Sens. J., 2012, no. 12, pp. 44–50.
  6. Wang H., Yang Y., Huang Z., Gui H. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2015, no. 64, pp. 1075–1083.
  7. Yang Y., Wang H., Cao Y., Gui H., Liu J., Lu L., Cao H., Yu T., You H. Opt. Laser Technol., 2015, no. 73, pp. 44–49.
  8. Kramer A., Paul T.A. OSA Tech. Digest (CD), Optical society of America, 2010, paper SThD2.
  9. Prerana, Shenoy M.R., Pal B.P., Gupta B.D. IEEE Sensors J., 2012, no. 1(12), January.
  10. Prerana, Shenoy M.R., Pal B.P. Appl. Opt., 2008, Vol. 47, pp. 3216–3220.
  11. Karthik V., Rao S.S., Shenoy M.R., Prerana, Pal B.L. Asian. J. Chem., 2006, vol. 18, pp. 3344–3347.
  12. Alvarenga I., Delgado F.S., Juca M.A., Silveria D.D., Coelho T.V.N., Bessa A.S. Journal of Modern Optics, 2017, no. 3(64), pp. 214–217.
  13. Carrara L., Fiergolski A. Appl. Sci., 2019, no. 9, pp. 2206.
  14. Pallares A., Schmitt P., Uhring W. Sensors, 2021, no. 21, pp. 3136, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21093136.
  15. Elsgolts L.E. Differentsial'nyye uravneniya i variatsionnoye ischisleniye (Differential Equations and the Calculus of Variations), Moscow, 1974, 432 р. (in Russ.)