ISSN 0021-3454 (print version)
ISSN 2500-0381 (online version)
Menu

9
Issue
vol 67 / September, 2024
Article

DOI 10.17586/0021-3454-2016-59-8-699-707

UDC 681.52:372.862.896

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC VISUAL ACUITY ESTIMATION METHODS

Y. A. Rotz
St. Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, Department of Mechatronics; Post-Graduate Student


Read the full article 

Abstract. Two patented methods of dynamic visual acuity (DVA) evaluating are described. Method 1 found on using the device that contain a rotating cylinder with a optotype table (strings of black squares separated by white stripes) on the outer surface. Method 2 found on using of high-speed video recording of patient eye movements during recognition of moving optotype (Landolt ring demonstrated on the screen). Statistics on the DVA values measured in a group of subjects in the age 21—35 years was collected (number of participants: method 1—42, method 2—9). The mean DVA value obtained from measurements by the method 1 equals to 25.08 ms, and measurements by the method 2 give 272 ms. Results of performed measurements are presented in various systems of units.
Keywords: dynamic visual acuity, visual performance, static visual acuity, optotype, optotype chart, minimum angle of resolution of an eye (MAR), eye tracking

References:

 

  1. http://glazamed.ru/oftalmologiya/.
  2. Luizov A.V. Inertsiya zreniya (Inertia of Sight), Moscow, 1961, 249 р. (in Russ.)
  3. Yuldashev Z.M., Chigirev B.I., Yurkovskiy G.A. Biomeditsinskaya elektronika (Biomedical Electronics), St. Petersburg, 1996. (in Russ.)
  4. Musalimov V.M., Rotts Yu.A. VII International Conference young scientists and specialists “Optics-2011”, Abstracts of Papers, St. Petersburg, ITMO University, 2011. (in Russ.)
  5. Rotts Yu.A. Sb. materialov XL Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. „Nedelya nauki SPbGPU“ (Proceedings of the XL International Scientific and Practical Conference “The Week of Science of Saint-Petersburg State Polytechnic University“), St. Petersburg, 2011. (in Russ.)
  6. Rotts Yu.A. Izv. vuzov. Priborostroenie, 2012, no. 6(55), pp. 63–66. (in Russ.)
  7. Rotts Yu.A. Problemy mekhaniki i tochnosti v priborostroenii (Problems of Mechanics and Precision in Instrumentation), St. Petersburg, ITMO University, 2012, pp. 305–306. (in Russ.)
  8. Rotts Yu.A., Musalimov V.M. Biomedical Engineering, 2014, no. 3, pp. 17–21. (in Russ.)
  9. Rotts Yu.A., Musalimov V.M. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2013, no. 5(87), pp. 49–53. (in Russ.)
  10. Rotts Yu.A. XI Session of International Scientific School “Fundamental and Problem Problems of Reliability Both Diagnostic of Ambulances and Dodges“, Abstracts of Papers, St. Petersburg, 2013, рр. 340–347. (in Russ.)
  11. Iomdina E.N., Bauer S.M., Kotlyar K.E. Biomekhanika glaza: teoreticheskie aspekty i klinicheskie prilozheniya (Biomechanics of the Eye: Theoretical Aspects and Clinical Application), Moscow, 2015, 208 р. (in Russ.)
  12. Kubarko A.I., Lukashevich I.V. Meditsinskiy zhurnal, 2007, no. 1, pp. 19. (in Russ.)
  13. Urmakher L., Ayzenshtat L. Oftal'mologicheskie pribory (Ophthalmic Instruments), Moscow, 1988, 288 р. (in Russ.)
  14. Patent RU 2462174, MKP7 A61B3/032. Sposob opredeleniya dinamicheskoy ostroty zreniya i ustroystvo dlya ego osushchestvleniya (Method of Determining the Dynamic Visual Acuity and Device for Its Implementation), Vorontsov E.A., Musalimov V.M., Saenko A.P. 2012.
  15. ISO 8596. Optika i opticheskie pribory. Proverka ostroty zreniya. Standartnyy optotip i ego pred"yavlenie (Optics and Optical Instruments. Check Visual Acuity. Standard Optotype and Its Presentation), 1994.
  16. ISO 8597. Optika i opticheskie pribory. Proverka ostroty zreniya (Optics and optical instruments. Check visual acuity).
  17. Patent RU 2531132, MPK A61B3/113. Sposob opredeleniya skorosti slozhnoy zritel'no-motornoy reaktsii ispytuemogo i ustroystvo dlya ego osushchestvleniya (Method of Determining the Speed of Complex Visual-Motor Reaction of the Test Subject and the Device for Its Implementation), Rotts Yu.A., Musalimov V.M., Pol'te G.A., 2014.
  18. Ludvigh E.J. Archives of Ophthalmology, 1949, no. 42, pp. 14–22.
  19. Langmuir I. Science, 1938, no. 87, pp. 233.
  20. Hoogerheide J. Aeromedica Acta, 1964, no. 9, pp. 139–145.
  21. Westheimer G. Archives of Ophthalmology, 1954, no. 52, pp. 932–941.
  22. Miller J.W., Ludvigh E. Survey of Ophthalmology, 1962, no. 7, pp. 83–116.
  23. Hoshina K., Tagami Y., Mimura O., Edagawa H., Matsubara M., Nakayama T. Clinical Ophthalmology, 2013, no. 7, pp. 627–632.
  24. Brown B. Vision Research, 1972, no. 12, pp. 305–321.
  25. Bhansali S.A., Stockwell C.W., Bojarb D.I. Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, 1993, no. 109, pp. 120–125.
  26. Lee M.H., Durnford S., Crowley J.S., Rupert A.H. Aviat. Space Environ. Med., 1997, no. 68, pp. 111–117.
  27. Johnson E.L. Computerized Dynamic Visual Acuity with Volitional Head Movement in Patients with Vestibular Dysfunction, Tampa, FL, USA, 2002.
  28. Roberts R.A., Gans R.G., Richard A.R., Richard E.G. J. Amer Academy Audiology, 2007, no. 18, pp. 236–244.
  29. Bark J. Independent Studies and Capstones, 2008, http://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/pacs_capstones/180.
  30. Herdman S.J., Schubert M.C., Das V.E., Tusa R.J. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg., 2003, no. 8(129), pp. 819–824.
  31. Hillman E., Bloomberg J., McDonald V., Cohen H. J. of Vestibular Research, 1999, no. 9, pp. 49–57.
  32. Quevedo L., Aznar-Casanova D., Merindano-Encina J.A., Cardonaa G., Sole-Forto J. J. of Optometry, 2012, no. 5, pp. 131–138.
  33. Low F.N. Archives of Ophthalmology, 1951, no. 45, pp. 80–99.
  34. McColgin F.H. J. of the Optical Society of America, 1960, no. 50, pp. 774–779.
  35. Holland D.A. Peripheral Dynamic Visual Acuity under Randomized Tracking Task Difficulty, Target Velocities, and Direction of Target Presentation, Doctor’s thesis, Blacksburg, VA, USA, 2001.
  36. Tian J.R., Shubayev I., Demer J.L. Experimental Brain Research, 2001, no. 137, pp. 12–25.
  37. Kohmura Y., Yoshigi H., Sakuraba K., Honda K. Aoki K. Human Performance Measurement, 2007, no. 4, pp. 25–30.
  38. Vujko Muzdalo. Coll. Antropology, 2013, no. 37(suppl. 1), pp. 275–285.