APPROACHES TO THE DESCRIPTION OF OPTICAL SURFACE MICROTOPOGRAPHY
Abstract. The necessity of using a physical fractal model in regulatory and design documents for optical surfaces is substantiated, as this allows an adequate assessment of energy losses associated with radiation scattering. The expediency of switching from two-dimensional to three-dimensional measurements in the normalization and determination of roughness is noted.
References:
1. Whitehouse D.J. Handbook of Surface Metrology, NY, 1994, 350 р. 2. Kopylov V.V. Bulletin of RUDN, Engineering Research Series, 2009, no. 2, pp. 24–31. (in Russ.) 3. Davydov V.M., Prokhorets O.V., Yazykov V.A. Bulletin of Bryansk State Technical University, 2015, no. 2(46), pp. 104–109. (in Russ.) 4. Solk S.V., Sabinin V.E. Journal of Optical Technology, 2005, no. 11(72), pp. 875–877, https://doi.org/10.1364/ JOT.72.000875. 5. Medunetsky V.M., Solk S.V., Glushchenko L.A. Journal of Instrument Engineering, 2023, no. 6(66), pp. 524–527, DOI: 10.17586/0021-3454-2023-66-6- 524-527. (in Russ.) 6. Toporets A.S. Optika sherokhovatoy poverkhnosti (Optics of a Rough Surface), Leningrad, 1988, 191 р. (in Russ.) 7. Glushchenko L.A., Divin V.D., Malinova T.P., Matveev V.Yu., Nilov O.M., Pavlov N.I. Lazery. Izmereniya. Informatsiya (Lasers. Measurements. Information), Proceedings of the International Conference, Academy of Engineering Sciences of Russia, International Society for Optical Engineering, St. Petersburg, June 5–7, 2012, рр. 266–275. (in Russ.) 8. Glushchenko L.A., Popov I.A., Sidorovsky N.V., Morgunov K.K. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg Branch of the Academy of Engineering Sciences named after A.M. Prokhorov, 2007, no. 3, pp. 431–441. (in Russ.) 9. Brylkin Yu.V. News of the Kabardino-Balkarian State University, 2014, no. 5(IV), pp. 86–89. (in Russ.) 10. Popov I.A., Glushchenko L.A., Uozumi J. Optics. Communications, 2002, vol. 203, рp. 191–196.
