ISSN 0021-3454 (print version)
ISSN 2500-0381 (online version)
Menu

7
Issue
vol 67 / July, 2024
Article

DOI 10.17586/0021-3454-2024-67-7-574-585

UDC 62-293

DRY BRUSH MODEL FOR ROBOTIC PAINTING

A. I. Karimov
St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University LETI, Department of Computer-Aided Design; Associate Professor


M. D. Strelnikov
St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI”, Department of ComputerAided Design Systems; Technician


S. V. Mazin
St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI”, Department of ComputerAided Design Systems; Technician


D. S. Goryunov
St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI”, Department of ComputerAided Design Systems; Technician


M. V. Kulagin
St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI”, Department of ComputerAided Design Systems; Assistant


T. I. Karimov
Saint Petersburg State Electrotechnical University “LETI”, Saint Petersburg, 197376, Russian Federation; Assistant

Reference for citation: Karimov A. I., Strelnikov M. D., Mazin S. V., Goryunov D. S., Kulagin M. V., Karimov T. I. Dry brush model for robotic painting. Journal of Instrument Engineering. 2024. Vol. 67, N 7. P. 574–585 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17586/0021-3454-2024-67-7-574-585.

Abstract. Robotic painting, which combines advanced image generation algorithms with modern mechatronics, is considered as one of the areas of computer creativity. Results of developing a brush model for a robot artist based on the collaborative robot Jaka Zu 3, are presented. Particular attention is paid to the dry brush effect, a technique in which “airy”, textured strokes are applied with a brush containing a small amount of paint. This technique has not been used in machine painting on purpose before. An experimental setup is described, including a collaborative robot Jaka Zu 3 with a brush, a table, a canvas, a camera, and a lighting system. The concept of integral brushstroke density is introduced, which characterizes the amount of paint remaining on the canvas when a brushstroke is applied with a dry brush. Based on the experimental data, a new mathematical model is proposed that allows one to control the width of brushstrokes and their integral density. The obtained results can be used both in computer imitation of painting and in practical implementations of robot artist designs.
Keywords: robotics, robotic painting, robot artist, dry brush, Jaka Zu 3

Acknowledgement: the work was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Science Foundation, agreement No. 22-79-00171.

References:
  1. Oppenlaender J. Proceedings of the 25th International Academic Mindtrek Conference, 2022, рр. 192–202, DOI: 10.1145/3569219.3569352.
  2. Scalera L., Seriani S., Gasparetto A., Gallina P. Advances in Italian Mechanism Science: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of IFToMM, Italy, 2021, рр. 191–199.
  3. Gallina P. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 1999, no. 1(32), pp. 29–40.
  4. Scalera L., Seriani S., Gasparetto A., Gallina P. Robotics, 2019, no. 1(8), pp. 10.
  5. Lindemeier T., Metzner J., Pollak L., Deussen O. Comput. Graph. Forum, 2015, no. 2(34), pp. 311–323.
  6. Doug Marx and Luke Kelly’s Vangobot, Cloudpainter, http://www. cloudpainter.com/blog/2016/10/19/doug-marx-andluke-kellys-vangobot.
  7. Winner of the 2018 Robot Art prize, Cloudpainter, http://www.cloudpainter.com.
  8. https://www.liatgrayver.com/ABOUT.
  9. Grinberg I. et al. Proceedings of the 8th ACM Symposium on Computational Fabrication, 2023, рр. 1–2, DOI: 10.1145/3623263.3629150.
  10. Lin Y. et al. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Сonference on human factors in computing systems, 2020, рр. 1–14.
  11. Scalera L. et al. Robotics, 2021, no. 2(10), pp. 54.
  12. Beltramello A. et al. Robotics, 2020, no. 1(9), pp. 15.
  13. Scalera L. et al. Advances in Service and Industrial Robotics: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Robotics in Alpe-Adria-Danube Region, RAAD 2017, Springer International Publishing, 2018, рр. 549– 556.
  14. Sun Y., Xu Y. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), IEEE, 2013, рр. 185–190.
  15. Scalera L., Seriani S., Gasparetto A., Gallina P. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2018, рр. 1–16.
  16. Karimov A. et al. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2023, no. 3(107), pp. 34.
  17. Karimov A. et al. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2019, vol. 115, рр. 17–27.
  18. Gülzow J.M., Grayver L., Deussen O. Arts, MDPI, 2018, no. 4(7), pp. 84.
  19. Zeng K. et al. ACM Trans. Graph, 2009, no. 1(29), pp. 2:1–2:11.
  20. Chu N. et al. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering, 2010, рр. 27–34.
  21. Guo C. et al. Eighth International Conference on Graphic and Image Processing (ICGIP 2016), SPIE, 2017, vol. 10225, рр. 420–426.
  22. Zhao J. et al. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2022, vol. 404, рр. 113906.
  23. Sorbie K. S. Polymer-improved Oil Recovery, Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
  24. Gusev Yu.I., Karasev I.N., Kolman-Ivanov E.E. Konstruirovaniye i raschet mashin khimicheskikh proizvodstv (Design and Calculation of Chemical Production Machines), Moscow, 1985. (in Russ.) 25. Eberhard U. et al. Frontiers in Physics, 2019, vol. 7, рр. 71.