DOI 10.17586/0021-3454-2025-68-9-792-798
UDC 630.43:005.584.1
SYNTHESIS OF A METHOD OF MULTIWAVE SPECTROPHOTOMETRY FOR FOREST FIRES EARLY DETECTION SYSTEMS
Research Institute of Aerospace Informatics of National Aerospace Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan ; Director of the Institute
H. H. Asadov
S&R Institute, Ministry of Defense Industry, Azerbaijan; Section head, Associate professor
H. Z. Bayramov
Azerbaijan National Aerospace Agency;
L. I. Nuriyeva
Research Institute of Aerospace Informatics of National Aerospace Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan ; Head of Department
Abstract. A multi-sign method of laser control of the fire situation in the forest is proposed. In the process of burning in the forest, a significant amount of greenhouse gases and heat is released into the atmosphere. The main gases released are carbon dioxide, methane, nitrogen oxide, and carbon monoxide. An overview of publications on methods of early detection of forest fires is presented. An approach to improvement the sensitivity of fire detection in a forest by means of simultaneously registering all emitted gases is considered. The approach makes use of the differential absorption method for each gas with an integrated laser node emitting at several specially selected wavelengths. The optimization of the proposed method is carried out, as a result of which recommendations are developed for the construction of a highly sensitive system for early detection of forest fires at specified energy consumption.
References:
1. Arrue B.C., Ollero A., Matinez de Dios J.R. IEEE Intelligent Systems and their Applications, 2000, no. 3(15). 2. Wu X., Leung X., and Leung H. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), Banff, AB, Canada, October, 2017, pp. 1954–1959. 3. Yuan C., Liu Z., and Zhang Y. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2018, no. 1-2(93), pp. 337–349. 4. Chan C.C., Alvi S.A., Zhou X., Durrani S., Wilson N. Electrical Engineering and Systems Science, 2023, https://arxiv. org/abs/2312.10919. 5. Setrige W., Crawford S., Eftenhari S. Special feature, December 2018, no. 4(21), pp. 32–40. 6. Veselovski I., Hu Q., Ansmann A., Goloub P., Podvin T., Korenskiy M. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2022, vol. 22, рр. 5209– 5221. 7. Rjoub D., Alsharoa A., Masadeh A. IEEE 96th Vehicular Technology Conference, London, United Kingdom, 2022, pp. 1–5. 8. Xian J., Xu W., Long C., Song Q., Yang S. Appl. Opt., 2020, no. 59(28), pp. 8638–8644. 9. Mohapatra A., Trinh T. Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, рр. 12270, https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912270. 10. California Air Resources Board, “Wildfire Emission Estimates for 2021”, CARB, 2022, https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/wildfire- emissions. 11. Urbanski S. For. Ecol. Manag., 2014, vol. 317, pp. 51–60. 12. Schotland R.M. J. Appl. Meteorol., 1974, no. 13, pp. 71–77. 13. Belleci C., Francucci M., Gaudio P., Gelfusa M., Martellucci S., Richetta M. Remote Sensing for Agriculture. Ecosystems and Hydrology VII, 2005, vol. 5976. 14. Lakshmanna K., Khare N., and Khare N. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 2016, no. 3(9), pp. 91–100. 15. Elsgolts L.E. Differentsial'nyye uravneniya i variatsionnyye ischisleniya (Differential Equations and Variational Calculus), Moscow, 1974, 432 р. (in Russ.)
